#Iphoto com for mac#
#Iphoto com mac os x#
#Iphoto com software#

While syncing my locally stored photo library, the cloud service failed to do its job properly.Įven though my iPhoto library of 18,000 images isn’t considered large by Apple standards, and my home Internet is speedy in both directions, my library took nearly three days and nights to upload to the cloud - far longer than Apple estimated. That’s because Apple says the two photo products are closely “intertwined.”Īlas, my positive feelings about Photos on the Mac didn’t extend to iCloud Photo Library.

#Iphoto com software#

It’s faster, easier to use and has a more modern feel.Īnd although the new Photos software can be used without the cloud service, I’ve been testing that, too, roping an iPhone and two iPads into the process. I’ve been testing the new Photos app on two different Macs, and I consider it a big improvement over iPhoto.

#Iphoto com mac os x#

It’s essentially a Mac app that catches up to the superior look and feel of the Photos apps on the iPhone and iPad, but with greater power.Īt the same time, Apple has introduced an optional service, called iCloud Photo Library, which stores all your photos in the cloud and syncs them among all your Apple devices.īoth have been in beta, or test releases, but became available to everyone last week as part of Mac OS X Yosemite 10.10.3. It’s much faster, less cluttered and has more editing options, yet still makes them simple to use. Now, at last, Apple has replaced iPhoto with a new, free Mac app called simply Photos. It was often slow to scroll through thousands of pictures, and its minimal editing tools seemed increasingly inadequate. Rather than focusing on tweaking individual photos to perfection, it was centered on easy organizing of the many images people were beginning to accumulate via digital cameras.īut as a tidal wave of photos arrived from smartphones in recent years, the iPhoto software became overwhelmed. Shame on the author for being so uninformed on a topic about which she is purporting to provide advice.When Apple introduced iPhoto in 2002, it was a tremendous boon to casual photographers.

(Reading the first two items on the list and the first sentence of the third was sufficient for the purposes of steering my mother-in-law away from this article.) This list is best ignored. I''ll stop there, because that''s where I stopped reading the article. Lightroom is a photo organizer with basic editing capabilities, while Photoshop is a powerful photo editor that can''t be used to organize photos.

#Iphoto com for mac#

'Adobe Lightroom for Mac is the Photoshop version of Mac.' That''s incorrect Lightroom and Photoshop are two different applications with two different primary functions. Aperture was no longer available for purchase about a year before this article was published, with Apple announcing plans to stop supporting Aperture in favor of its Photos app long before that.ģ. Google started phasing Picasa out at least six months before this article was published. (Maybe ask your son-in-law if you have one?)ġ. Basically, my message is to pretend like this article doesn''t exist and find another resource. I write this comment in the hope that it may help others avoid wasting time (as my mother-in-law did) relying on this article, and not with the specific aim of criticizing the author for publishing an ill-informed, sloppily researched article.